CVE-2026-92788
- Published16 Sept 2026
Description
Coze Studio through 0.5.1 fails to validate that table names in workflow SQL customization nodes belong to the caller's workspace. Authenticated attackers can enumerate predictable table identifiers and execute SQL statements against other workspaces' memory databases to read, insert, or delete data.
CVSS 3.1 breakdown
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HRemediation
No fixed version is recorded in the NVD data. Check the vendor advisory for the latest guidance.
References
- https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio
- https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/blob/22275b1c2661d35344a7493cffe401e8cc61cf8e/backend/domain/memory/database/service/database_impl.go#L2203-L2250
- https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/blob/22275b1c2661d35344a7493cffe401e8cc61cf8e/backend/infra/rdb/impl/rdb/mysql.go#L825-L830
- https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/2710
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/coze-studio-through-0.5.1-cross-tenant-database-access-via-workflow-sql-node
Related CVEs
Recent high-severity vulnerabilities sharing a weakness type.
Frequently asked
Is CVE-2026-92788 being actively exploited?
CVE-2026-92788 is not in the CISA KEV catalog.
How severe is CVE-2026-92788?
CVE-2026-92788 has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8, rated high.
How do I fix CVE-2026-92788?
Apply the vendor's patch or advisory guidance, then verify no affected versions remain across your devices.
How Secuno handles this
Secuno correlates vulnerabilities like CVE-2026-92788 against the real software inventory on every managed device, every day. Rather than a static severity, each match is scored in context: exploit availability, EPSS, the asset's exposure, and business criticality decide where it lands in the queue. If an affected version is present anywhere across your portfolio, it surfaces automatically with a prioritised remediation path.
Data from the NVD, CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS. CVSS 3.1 base score shown where available.